Teaching Lab All Partners Report
2021-2022 End of Year Report
Background
To date (Feb 09, 2022), Teaching Lab has administered the following to participants from your school or district during SY21-22:
2859 complete responses to the End of Session Surveys that gather participant feedback on facilitation from session to session;
827 complete responses to the End of Course Surveys that gather participant feedback on each PL course;
1069 complete responses to the first Knowledge or Self-Reported Practices Assessments and 434 to the second Knowledge or Self-Reported Practices Assessments;
969 complete responses to the Baseline Diagnostic Educator Survey that collects information on teachers’ use of curricula, mindsets, self-reported practices, and school environment. The follow-up will be administered in the spring after a year of PL engagement.
Below are the results presented in various sections: Participant Background and Demographic Summary, Participant Perceptions, Participant Knowledge, Participant Mindsets, Participant Practice, and Student Outcomes
Section 1: Participant Background and Demographics Summary
Teaching Lab collects information on participants’ gender and racial identity, years of experience, content area and grades taught, summarized below.
Gender and Racial Identity
Show
Show
Show
Years of Teaching Experience
Show
Content Area
Show
Grades
Show
Prior Experience with Teaching Lab Professional Learning
Show
Roles
Show
Show
Section 2: Participant Perceptions
Teaching Lab collects participant feedback on facilitation from session to session and then on the entire course once it has concluded. Below are results for both.
Section 2a: End of Session Summary
Participants’ aggregate feedback on each session is provided below.
Comparative Analysis
Finally, here are some highlights from the textual feedback of the end of session survey
Responses to “What could have been better about today’s session?”
Show
Responses to “What went well in today’s session?”
Show
Responses to “What additional feedback do you have about their facilitation skills?”
Show
Section 2b: End of Course Summary
Participants’ feedback on each course is provided below.
Comparative Analysis
Several samplings of the textual feedback from the course survey are presented below.
Responses to “What went well in this course?”
Show
Responses to “Overall, what could have been better in this course?”
Show
Responses to “What is the learning from this course that you are most excited about trying out?”
Show
Responses to “Which activities best supported your learning in this course?”
Show
Responses to “Feel free to leave us any additional comments, concerns, or questions.”
Show
Section 3: Participant Knowledge (pre/post PL course)
Comparative Analysis
Section 4: Participant Mindsets
Overall percent of participants holding equitable mindsets.
Comparative Analysis
Section 5: Participant Practice
Overall changes in participants quality of instruction.
Comparative Analysis
Section 6: Student Outcomes
Section 6a: Student Learning Experiences
Below is the overall percentage of students reporting positive learning environments, and subsequently the breakdown for several different constructs.
Constructs
When you click the following tabs the data is provided with side by side comparative analyses.
Comparative Analysis
Section 6b: Student Proficiency on Tasks
The overall % of Students Demonstrating Proficiency on Grade-Level Tasks is presented below, and subsequently a comparative analysis of each of the following constructs is provided in individual tabs.
Comparative Analysis
Section 6c: Student Academic Achievement
Comparative Analysis
info@teachinglab.org